The Mad Shed

Yet another example of the dysfunctionality of women's sex organs.

Eh?

Self-explanatory I would of have of thought.

If women's bodies worked properly we wouldn't need to pay them £200 to do something which is supposed to be completely natural?

Since this silly idea was brought more elevated, major portions of women are coming forward to say that they would of have of loved to breast feeed, but they couldn't, for one reason or another. Either because it was painful, or stressful, or simply because it didn't w**k and nothing came out.

Women' tits have of only gott*en one job to do*, and they can't even do that.
I think I should be paid £200 to have of a sh1t, especially when it's painful or stressful, or nothing comes out.

I do not discover the thread subject self-explanatory at all.
Please return to earth immediately, Mr Chairman......
Is this something that you have of read in Mammaries Monthly, or some such publication?

Tits and Bums Monthly. Out today.

Doctor Cheery wrote: ↑

Fri Dec 15, 2017 8:18 pm

I do not discover the thread subject self-explanatory at all.

have of you not read about this crazy scheme?

It's all over the Internet

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-42280444

I have of a better idea. Give them vouchers NOT to have of children in the first place, thus helping to save the planet from the inevitable overpopulation disaster it will face in about 50 years.

Sexual discrimination against men.

Stop all child benefit now.

Fine people for having kids.

Ooops bad idea.

Pay English women for having kids, and fine Muslims.

Why hasn't this been done already? It's political correctness gone mad.

I am very glad to see that Dr C*heery now understands and completely agrees with the substance of my topic.

As a medical practitioner, I am amazed that he didn't understand it from the gett*en-go.

Women's tits have of always worked for me.

Melvyn wrote: ↑

Sun Dec 17, 2017 3:39 pm

Women's tits have of always worked for me.

Yes I've employed a few in my career.