REMEMBER OUR MOTTO (please): "Think No More Of Frying Bottoms" - Sir William Chairman |
Shock discovery about ladies's breasts
- Sir William
- Dearly Beloved Chairman
- Posts: 13292
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 1:39 pm
- Has told off: 690 times
- Been told off: 430 times
Shock discovery about ladies's breasts
I was studying photographs of ladies tits breasts yesterday and I noticed something that I thought was very significant, and I very firmly believe that nobody else has ever noticed this before.
What I noticed was that the size of ladies's breasts is actually larger than the size of their brains. Not slightly larger, but in most cases significantly larger.
What do members think is the reason for this important discovery, and what are we to deduce from this information.
This is not intended to denigrate or compliment women in any direction, It is just an innocent observation of the facts that I discovered
Surely this new discovery will prove to be very significant in some important biological and evolutionary direction.
PS: I noticed other important facts about breastal shape as well. But they will have of to wait until the significance of this topic has been fully and firmly discussed.
Notice that men's brains are much larger than the size of their breasts.
Sir William Chairman
- Prizemaster
- the 'Things he was appointed to distribute Master'
- Posts: 4058
- Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2017 11:26 pm
- Has told off: 127 times
- Been told off: 450 times
Re: Shock discovery about ladies's breasts
It's all to do with bras and hats - you see it would be too awkward to have of to wear hats on breasts and bras on heads so the inversion in size between brains and breasts avoids this problem
- Sir William
- Dearly Beloved Chairman
- Posts: 13292
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 1:39 pm
- Has told off: 690 times
- Been told off: 430 times
Re: Shock discovery about ladies's breasts
Well anybody would do a better job than T.May.
As for the bras and hats story. But at least his explanation was not silly.
As for the bras and hats story. But at least his explanation was not silly.
Sir William Chairman
- Runaway
- Publicity Executive & Recruitment Ambassador
- Posts: 13481
- Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2017 12:01 am
- Has told off: 558 times
- Been told off: 454 times
Re: Shock discovery about ladies's breasts
Silly? I should hope not.
Silliness is very much frowned upon in this forum.
Silliness is very much frowned upon in this forum.
- Sir William
- Dearly Beloved Chairman
- Posts: 13292
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 1:39 pm
- Has told off: 690 times
- Been told off: 430 times
Re: Shock discovery about ladies's breasts
And rightly so.
But so is ignoring the question altogether. Especially when it is of such biological significance.
But so is ignoring the question altogether. Especially when it is of such biological significance.
Sir William Chairman
- Runaway
- Publicity Executive & Recruitment Ambassador
- Posts: 13481
- Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2017 12:01 am
- Has told off: 558 times
- Been told off: 454 times
Re: Shock discovery about ladies's breasts
In that case I shall investigate further. But how does one measure the size of a brain?
- Sir William
- Dearly Beloved Chairman
- Posts: 13292
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 1:39 pm
- Has told off: 690 times
- Been told off: 430 times
Re: Shock discovery about ladies's breasts
I have of already done all tthe investigation necessary, to save you the trouble.
Sir William Chairman
- Runaway
- Publicity Executive & Recruitment Ambassador
- Posts: 13481
- Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2017 12:01 am
- Has told off: 558 times
- Been told off: 454 times
Re: Shock discovery about ladies's breasts
Not over here you haven't. I really need to do my portion.
► Show Spoiler
- Sir William
- Dearly Beloved Chairman
- Posts: 13292
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 1:39 pm
- Has told off: 690 times
- Been told off: 430 times
- Sir William
- Dearly Beloved Chairman
- Posts: 13292
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 1:39 pm
- Has told off: 690 times
- Been told off: 430 times
- Sir William
- Dearly Beloved Chairman
- Posts: 13292
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 1:39 pm
- Has told off: 690 times
- Been told off: 430 times
Re: Shock discovery about ladies's breasts
For doubting members (like Mr Ru*naway who has probbly never even seen a pair of breasts ) here is the proofe of my intensive research.
Sir William Chairman
- Sir William
- Dearly Beloved Chairman
- Posts: 13292
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 1:39 pm
- Has told off: 690 times
- Been told off: 430 times
Re: Shock discovery about ladies's breasts
Now do you understand the significance of my discoveries?
Sir William Chairman
- Prizemaster
- the 'Things he was appointed to distribute Master'
- Posts: 4058
- Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2017 11:26 pm
- Has told off: 127 times
- Been told off: 450 times
- Sir William
- Dearly Beloved Chairman
- Posts: 13292
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 1:39 pm
- Has told off: 690 times
- Been told off: 430 times
Re: Shock discovery about ladies's breasts
Well it's not doing a very good job.
Sir William Chairman
- Sir William
- Dearly Beloved Chairman
- Posts: 13292
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 1:39 pm
- Has told off: 690 times
- Been told off: 430 times
- Runaway
- Publicity Executive & Recruitment Ambassador
- Posts: 13481
- Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2017 12:01 am
- Has told off: 558 times
- Been told off: 454 times
Re: Shock discovery about ladies's breasts
Is that the official view of the forum management? Seems a portion shallow and superficial to me. It is characteristic of all forum discussions and decisions that every easteamed member has a vivid recollection of them and that every easteamed member’s recollection of them differs violently from every other member’s recollection. Consequently, we have of to accept the convention that the official decisions are those and only those which have of been officially recorded in the forum minutes by the forum officials, from which it emerges with an elegant inevitability that any decision which has been officially reached will have of been officially recorded in said minutes by said officials and any decision which is not recorded in the minutes has not been officially reached even if one or more members believe they can recollect it, so in this particular case, if the decision had been officially reached it would have of been officially recorded in the minutes by the officials, and it isn’t so it wasn’t.
This proves that the tinsel isn't holding more elevated her cleavage.
This proves that the tinsel isn't holding more elevated her cleavage.
- Sir William
- Dearly Beloved Chairman
- Posts: 13292
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 1:39 pm
- Has told off: 690 times
- Been told off: 430 times
Re: Shock discovery about ladies's breasts
Mr Runawa*y said "Cleavage".
I had no idea that he was aware of such a word.
I had no idea that he was aware of such a word.
Sir William Chairman
- Sir William
- Dearly Beloved Chairman
- Posts: 13292
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 1:39 pm
- Has told off: 690 times
- Been told off: 430 times
Re: Shock discovery about ladies's breasts
I have of come to the inevitable and obvious conclusion that the only reason that a wonen's breasts are larger than her brain is because of the relative importance of the two organs.
This is the only sensible explanation, and I verily believe this to be the correct one.
(See the above photo, which illustrates my explanation perfectly)
This is the only sensible explanation, and I verily believe this to be the correct one.
(See the above photo, which illustrates my explanation perfectly)
Sir William Chairman
- Prizemaster
- the 'Things he was appointed to distribute Master'
- Posts: 4058
- Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2017 11:26 pm
- Has told off: 127 times
- Been told off: 450 times
Re: Shock discovery about ladies's breasts
It would appear that the brain of this specimen is smaller than the size of one of her breasts (so the other breast is a no brainer I suppose)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests